Принимаем к оплате

Принимаем к оплате Webmoney

Купить Английский, вариант 2
Английский, вариант 2

Есть в наличии.
  Цена:
450.00 руб.

В нашем магазине вы сможете купить Английский, вариант 2 дешево и надежно. Оплата онлайн, любым удобным способом. I. Перепишите и устно переведите текст, подчёркивая придаточные определительные предложения. Письменно переведите абзац 2.
1. On 7 and 8 September 2006, economics researches from the EU and the US gathered in Brussels for the third annual research conference, which is devoted to the subject of «Adjustment under monetary unions: financial market issues».
Opening the session on «Key policy questions», Vitor Gaspar of the Bank of Portugal, presenting a paper co-authored with Gabriel Fagan of the ECB, spoke about «adjusting to the euro». Pointing out that participation in monetary union brings complex consequences, he presented an analytical model that explains several of these. Preparations for EMU caused a number of Member State economies to converge more than others. In particular he cited Greece, Spain, Ireland, Italy and Portugal, which had relatively high interest rates that converged on those of Germany and other states that had lower interest rates. In addition to lowering the cost of borrowing, EMU brought these countries easier access to international financial markets and encouraged liberalization and integration. The consequence of this was easier access to cheaper money in these countries, which gave a significant impulse to consumer and household expenditure and borrowing, thus producing a fall in savings and an increase in current account deficits as spending pulled in imports and external capital was widely available to finance the resulting imbalances.
2. In the second session, Werner Roeger, who had written a paper jointly with Sven Langedijk, presented a model-based analysis of economic adjustment in the euro area. The model, which distinguishes between tradable and non-tradable sectors and further disaggregates non-tradables into housing and services, analyses the experience of four countries that have different economic-adjustment experiences under the euro. These countries are: Germany, Spain, Ireland and Portugal. The result suggest that diverging growth, inflation and current account developments may be attributed to adjustments to the euro-area framework, which seem to have broadly run their course. Country-specific shocks to housing investment, the labour market and total factor productivity also play a role in explaining the persistence of output and inflation differentials in the euro area. Michael Bergman, who is a senior professor of the University of Copenhagen, also considered economic shocks – in particular, how sectoral real exchange rates (which reflect price and exchange rate differences between countries) react to shocks and how they recover over time. Using price data from 24 manufacturing sectors and ten euro-area members, Bergmann presented results that suggest the introduction of the euro has not had a significant effect on the recovery rates of price differentials resulting from economic shocks. Rather, the industry type plays a larger role with more competitive capital-intensive sectors adjusting prices more rapidly than less-competitive sectors that maintain price differentials longer.
Доп. информация
II. Изучите и переведите следующие образцы предложений. Перепишите следующие предложения, вставляя в пропуски одно из относительных местоимений (who, whom, whose, that, which), и переведите на русский язык.
1. Carl Haigh, … was interviewed last week on TV, has won the Nobel Prize for science.
2. Chinese tabs … are very popular among patients … are trying to lose weight have been banned by the Department of health after clinical trials.
3. Jason Douglas, of … you must have heard, will be opening the exhibition.
4. Residents, ... flats have been flooded, took refuge in holiday camps.
5. The gales, ... were the worst in the living memory, caused devastation in coastal regions.
6. The man ... had robbed the Central Bank was arrested yesterday.
7. The medicine, about ... the manufacturers say that it has miraculous results, is certainly very effective as a pain-killer.
8. They made a full investigation ... lasted six months.
9. We have employed several temporary secretaries, ... are reliable and efficient.
10. We have received 30,000 roof tiles, about 10% of ... were cracked on delivery.

III. Изучите и переведите следующие образцы предложений, содержащие объектный инфинитивный оборот («глагол в личной форме + имя существительное/местоимение в объектном падеже + инфинитив»). Переведите следующие предложения на русский язык.
1. I expect them to write very soon.
2. We offered our partners to send a replacement.
3. My teachers taught me to believe in myself.
4. Employers’ federation urged the Minister to cut the interest rates.
5. The newly employed chief executive’s expertise enabled our firm to get bigger profits.
6. They programmed a robot to perform a number of different tasks.
7. We pay them to do their duty.
8. Computer industry has relied on small firms to carry out research and development work.
9. We want our in-house scientists to keep an eye on the outside world.
10. They can find innovative ways to bring them to market and guarantee future sources of income for their employers.
11. We believe the existing process to be inadequate to the requirements.
12. Ford’s management uses the company’s intranet to inform staff about company business.
Количество продаж товара - 0
Тип товара: Товар: файл (40504200955743.rar, 12175 байтов)
Загружен - 04.05.2014 20:09:56
Продавец - ПОМОГУ ВЫПОЛНИТЬ !!!
Количество положительных отзывов: 0
Количество отрицательных отзывов: 0